NEEPS Forum Index NEEPS
North East Eco-friendly People's Site
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What do you think about personal carbon credits?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NEEPS Forum Index -> Global Warming, Climate Change etc
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wildgarlic
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 5240
Location: Alford-ish

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: What do you think about personal carbon credits? Reply with quote

Quote:

MPs back personal carbon credits

The government should go ahead with a system of personal "carbon credits" to meet emissions targets, MPs have said.

The Environmental Audit Committee said the scheme would be more effective than taxes for cutting carbon emissions.

Under the scheme people would be given an annual carbon limit for fuel and energy use - which they could exceed by buying credits from those who use less.

Environment minister Hilary Benn said there were practical drawbacks to the plan although it did have "potential".


Read More
_________________
Neeps Flickr Group - check out some of the fab photos from other Neepsters and share some of your own.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ina
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 3530
Location: Kincardineshire

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very difficult to regulate that, I think - and as usual, the rich will just buy up what they can. George Monbiot has something on that in his book Heat - have to read up again.
_________________
Ina
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PurpleDragon
Neepster
Neepster


Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 1257
Location: Turriff area

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it is just another ploy to make us think they actually give a damn. If they spent as much money on actually doing something as they do on talking about it, we might get somewhere.
_________________
No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Diana
Auctioneer/Moderator
Auctioneer/Moderator


Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1642
Location: Kincardineshire

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ina wrote:
Very difficult to regulate that, I think - and as usual, the rich will just buy up what they can.


Which would mean the "poor" would be not so poor?
_________________
Tumuli Design
Fill the frame
Being looby keeps me sane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ina
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 3530
Location: Kincardineshire

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Diana wrote:

Which would mean the "poor" would be not so poor?


Depends on the price, I suppose! If it comes to the point where the poor would have to sell their carbon credits to buy food (like the current problem for many of "heating or eating"), they'd still be poor. They might then have a little more money, but wouldn't be allowed to spend it on anything that releases carbon...
_________________
Ina
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jessica
Mini-Neepster with staying power
Mini-Neepster with staying power


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

... and generally the poor do not have money to invest in more carbon efficient appliances/heating system/transport etc.

Depends how big an allowance you would get - on a european industrial basis the initial allowance was actual very generous so that it would hardly have an effect but would make you think of what actually is carbon-inefficient.

However, the money that would be spend on such a system is probably better spend in grants to reduce carbon emission via insulation/renewable energies etc.
_________________
aka Dikeside
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maidenstone
Mini-Neepster with staying power
Mini-Neepster with staying power


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 69
Location: Chapel of Garioch

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And what about the people who can't give-a-damn?  They will just shell out more money for fuel etc., and not cut down a bit.  There is a large proportion of the population who will just carry on as normal.  It has to be done for them, or to them, so that they have no choice, but what ... I don't know.
_________________
Local food - better by far!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jessica
Mini-Neepster with staying power
Mini-Neepster with staying power


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the point is that there are not only paying more for fuel but also using up their carbon allowance - once that is used up they will have to buy allowances from peope who have some spare and that price again will vary depending on supply and demand - just like the fuel prices now.
_________________
aka Dikeside
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NEEPS Forum Index -> Global Warming, Climate Change etc All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group